How Corruption Influences Population Health

The study examines the link between corruption and mortality.

The authors find that corruption is associated with higher mortality, particularly in low-income countries. Corruption is also linked with weaker fiscal capacity, reduced government funding for health care, distorted resource allocation, and patterns consistent with misallocation of public funds. Additionally, the association between corruption and mortality varies across levels of public goods provision.

The study draws on country-level data from 102 countries spanning 2008-2018. They use econometric methods, including instrumental variables and the Mundlak approach. To mitigate endogeneity concerns, they employ an instrumental variable approach based on ancestry and oral tradition, using historical cultural factors plausibly related to contemporary corruption levels.

The study expands existing research on social determinants of health by highlighting the relevance of institutional and political factors for population health. Addressing corruption could be recognized as a public health priority, given its association with health financing and population health. The Sustainable Development Goals on combating corruption and improving health are found to be complementary. 

KYRIOPOULOS, I., MINOS, D., VANDOROS, S. and MOSSIALOS, E. (2026), How Corruption Influences Population Health. Milbank Quarterly., 104: 198-219. 

Open Access Article (2026)

photo Jordi Soldevila. Iteracions de la realitat en negre

______________________________________________________________________

Corporate governance: up to date

Corporate governance is the system by which companies are directed and controlled. Boards of directors are responsible for the governance of their companies. Nonprofit governance is a political and organizational process involving multiple functions and engaging multiple stakeholders. The responsibilities of the board include setting the company’s strategic aims, providing the leadership to put them into effect, supervising the management of the business and reporting to shareholders and stakeholders on their stewardship and to ensure the mission fullfillment and overall accountability.

Having a knowledgeable and engaged board, a board that understands its fiduciary role, its managerial role and depending on the type of institution its fundraising role. is very important specially in public institutions and non for profit.

The Centre for Research in Health and Economics CRES from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra has published recently some policy papers related to  Corporate Governance. 

• Dalmau-Matarrodona, E.; "Bones pràctiques del govern de les organitzacions" Health Policy Papers Collection 2026-4_ED [Download]
• López-Casasnovas, G., Planas-Miret, I.; "La gobernanza de la colaboración público-privada en sanidad. El caso de Catalunya." Health Policy Papers Collection 2026-3_GL_IP [Download]
• Ortún, V.; "Gobierno y gestión de las organizaciones sanitarias" Health Policy Papers Collection 2026-2_VO [Download]
• López-Casasnovas, G.; "Anomalies organitzatives als consells de govern de les organitzacions públiques" Policy Papers Collection 2026-3_GL [Download]

Another interesting paper published in 2014 by Yvonne D. Harrison (University of Albany) and Vic Murray (University of Victoria): Guidelines for Improving the Effectiveness of Boards of Directors of Nonprofit Organizations

photo Jordi Soldevila. Màcula Malèvich de Sant Pau

______________________________________________________________________

Specialty choices among new generation of doctors - insights from a Polish survey study

Currently, healthcare systems around the world are facing serious labour crises, significant shortages, and unequal geographical distribution of doctors. One of the key issues in maintaining an adequate health workforce is young graduates’ choice of medical specialty. Their career choices substantially influence the future balance between different medical specialties. To better align the choices of young doctors with the needs of the healthcare system, we have to understand the differences between doctors who are already working and those who are only just starting. 

Three generations currently dominate the population of doctors in the workforce: the baby boomers (born 1945–1964), generation X (born 1965–1979), and generation Y (millennials: born 1980–1994). Each generation brings its characteristics to the medical profession. The baby boomers are known for working long hours and viewing medicine as a tireless vocation, while generations X and Y are more tech-savvy, value mobility, and prioritize work-life balance.

Doctors currently entering the healthcare labour market (generation Z) were born between the late 1990s and early 2010s. This generation, also known as‘Gen-Z’, differs significantly from older generations in many ways. Gen-Z individuals were born into a world of widespread access to information, largely due to the internet. They are proficient in using modern technologies, more focused on achieving a healthy work-life balance, and are more open to change in their lives compared to the generations of their parents and grandparentts. However, they do not accept the current state of workplace culture and working hours. They strongly desire a life-work balance, flexibility in working conditions, and collaboration in the workplace.

Although they have chosen a medical career, many young healthcare professionals report that their expectations are not being met, especially concerning non-clinical tasks, including the administrative burden. They understand that the success of future healthcare systems is closely linked to the implementation of new technologies, recognizing its potential to reduce administrative workload and work-related stress. Besides salary, autonomy, collaboration, and technology play a crucial role in selecting a workplace (hospital or practice). To attract and retain this younger generation, healthcare organisations need to focus on team collaboration, a friendly working atmosphere, and adapt their work organisation practices accordingly.

In Poland, many specialties are experiencing a ‘generation gap, which requires well-thought-out decisions to compensate for the forthcoming crisis that would become even more serious if doctors at retirement age were to stop working.

This article aimed to provide evidence on the factors that drive young doctors to choose their future specialties, presenting differences between those applying for non-surgical specialties and those applying for surgical ones.

Article: open acces and pdf

photo Jordi Soldevila. Màcules de Barcelona. Màcula simple del carrer Escorial

______________________________________________________________________

No health without peace. Nothing more to say.

The right to health was laid out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, reaffirmed in the Alma Ata declaration, and remains embedded in contemporary WHO priorities. There is no credible path to achieving it that can run through perpetual conflict. Responding to the health consequences of war is necessary, but it cannot substitute for the conditions required to build, protect, and sustain health systems. Ambitions for equity, resilience, preparedness, and universal access cannot be realised amid chronic insecurity. 

Peace is not adjacent to health—it is foundational.

The Lancet editorial (2026) (pdf Volume 407, Issue 10523, 1)

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Geometries de la injustícia. Desesperació.
_______________________________________________________________________

The future hospital in Global Health Systems

Future hospitals must be able to adapt in many ways to the changing demands on their roles and functions within evolving healthcare delivery infrastructures. These include changing population structures and needs, new models of healthcare provision, technological advances, and innovations in design, all while enhancing their environmental sustainability.

This article sets out the issues that those determining healthcare policy and designing future hospitals must consider if they are to become and remain fit for purpose within the wider health and social care system. It also examines the need for, and challenges to, strategic healthcare planning, creating future hospitals that are sustainable, net‐zero carbon organisations, and ensuring resilience in the face of a range of potential shocks.

Future hospitals play a crucial role in healthcare worldwide, regardless of the country's income level. Hospitals cannot be viewed without broader health system changes, infrastructure, community and cultural factors, staffing and other considerations. Future hospitals will enhance population health in all settings and support the move towards more consumer‐centric healthcare. The authors urge clinical and policy planners to consider the factors discussed carefully to maximise the benefits.

Article (2025) open access

Sebire NJ, Adams A, Celi L, Charlesworth A, Gorgens M, Gorsky M, Landeg O, Nagasawa Y, Nimako KT, Onoka C, Roder-DeWan S, Watts N, McKee M. The Future Hospital in Global Health Systems: The Future Hospital Within the Healthcare System. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 May;40(3):741-751. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3891. Epub 2025 Jan 15. PMID: 39815953; PMCID: PMC12045726.

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Posidònies. Cicatriu 1

_______________________________________________________________________

The Great Resignation: Why women health workers are leaving

The ‘Great Resignation’ of women health workers is impacting women and health systems globally, with a concerning ‘Great Migration’ trend. This exodus exacerbates the existing health worker shortage crisis, affecting countries striving to achieve universal health coverage.The report published in October 2023 by Women in Global Health explores these issues in depth and calls for gender-transformative solutions to address workforce imbalances.

Countries competing for increasingly scarce trained health workers challenge the principles of global solidarity and ethical international recruitment, enshrined in global agreements like the WHO Code (WHO Code on the Practice of International Recruitment of Health Personnel)

"The WHO Code encourages all member states to act in solidarity, produce sufficient health workers domestically and invest in supporting countries with vulnerable health systems to strengthen their health workforce"

Health workers take years, sometimes over a decade to train, so lead times are long for producing the millions of new health workers needed to fill the gap. The urgent issue now is retaining trained health workers and reversing attrition from the sector.

Replacing domestic health workers with international recruits may just be putting new recruits into the same broken systems that caused the domestic health workers to leave. Coordinated action by governments is needed urgently to address health worker attrition in the short term and plan longer term to fill health worker shortages sustainably without reliance on unethical international recruitment.

The central role played by women health workers in the pandemic, along with the health and psychological impacts they endured in the course of their work, has placed a spotlight on their needs. Gender transformational change is needed to fix health workforce inequities and retain and attract back the women who are leaving. 

Women in the health workforce need a new social contract based on equal leadership, safe, decent and fairly paid work, to enable them to deliver health for all.

Report (pdf): 

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Els Monstres d'Ingres. IV

_______________________________________________________________________

When you see your neighbor's beard peeling, soak yours.

The NHS turns 77 this year 2025. Until recently, it has been widely regarded as the “crown jewel” of the British welfare state. Throughout its history, the NHS has achieved significant successes, including providing financial protection against the costs of ill health, incorporating formal assessments of new medical technologies, and delivering generally well-received care once accessed. Moreover, the NHS has been a driving force in medical research and innovation, pioneering advancements in treatments, healthcare delivery, and disease prevention. However, over a decade of austerity funding, compounded by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, has exposed its vulnerabilities. The NHS has shown limited resilience to external shocks and appears increasingly unsustainable in the face of growing demand.

Waiting lists are at an all-time high, population health outcomes in the UK are worsening, staff shortages and dissatisfaction remain persistent, and public confidence in the institution is wavering. In short, the NHS is in crisis.

The Labour government has increased NHS funding, but not to a level that several experts—including the LSE-Lancet Commission—deem sufficient to meet rising demands. The government has also announced a new 10-year plan. But will these measures be enough?

This event organized by the LSE last june explored the current state of the NHS, assessed whether the government's responses are adequate, and discussed whether more radical reforms are necessary. The discussion provided both critical reflection and potential solutions to address the crisis.

• Podcast to listen to.
• Video of the event to watch
• Slides and Speakers: to download here.

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Homenatge a Toni Catany Mandarina

_______________________________________________________________________

Doctors must live

Caroline Engen published in february 2025 the article: «Doctors must live»: a care ethics inquiry into physicians’ late modern suffering. Med Health Care and Philos 28, 275–290 (2025).

A good article to read (Free Acces) Article

Abstract: 

In 2023, thousands of young Norwegian physicians joined an online movement called #legermåleve (#doctorsmustlive) and shared stories of their own mental and somatic health issues, which they considered to be caused by unacceptable working conditions. 

This paper discusses this case as an extreme example of physicians’ and healthcare workers’ suffering in late modern societies, using Vosman and Niemeijer’s approach of rethinking care imaginaries by a structured process of thinking along, counter-thinking and rethinking, bringing to bear suffering as a heuristic device. 

1. Thinking along, taking the physicians’ stories and arguments literally, reveals an image of an unbearable workload. 
2. Counter-thinking resituates their suffering within the broader conditions of late modernity, suggesting that the root cause may lie not in the quantity of the workload itself but in its qualities and in its perceived threat to their integrity as caregivers through epistemic and moral injury and an inability to respond to this threat. 
3. In rethinking, the ambiguity of suffering– its dual potential as both a constraint and an opening– becomes central. 

Following the physicians’ own interpretations and the solutions emerging from this framing, both their suffering and that of their patients could paradoxically be exacerbated by further decentering physicians and reinforcing utilitarian, data-driven approaches. 

However, staying with their suffering and reinterpreting its causes opens possibilities to leverage critiques of medicalization at large and of their own suffering in particular, challenging the assumption that the weight of care must always grow heavier. 

From this reframing, I argue, it is possible to reclaim and reimagine care and the clinical space as a nexus of epistemic and moral privilege, recentering response-ability both relationally and socially.

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Els Monstres d'Ingres. III

_______________________________________________________________________

Marmot places. An initiative that must be implemented in Catalonia

"Social Injustice is killing people on a grand scale’. (M.Marmot)

Health inequalities are the systematic differences in health between social groups. Where they are judged to be avoidable differences they are inequitable, unfair. 

Putting them right is a matter of social justice. Reducing these inequities requires actions to improve the social determinants of health – the social, economic, political, physical and cultural conditions that shape our lives and our behaviours.

 
The UCL Institute of Health Equity  established in 2011 and being led by Professor Sir Michael Marmot leads and collaborates on work that addresses the social determinants of health and improves health equity. The IHE created the concept of Marmot Places. 

A Marmot Place recognises that health and health inequalities are shaped by the social determinants of health (SDH) and takes action on these social determinants at a local level. 

Sometimes called the building blocks of health, these social determinants are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age, such as education, employment and housing, and lead to wide differences in people’s health and in their life expectancy. Many places across England and Wales have become Marmot Places putting health equity at the heart of their local strategies.

Becoming a Marmot Place: 

Marmot Places develop and deliver interventions and policies to improve health equity based on eight principles:

1. Give every child the best start in life. 
2. Enable all children, young people and adults to maximise their capabilities and have control over their lives. 
3. Create fair employment and good work for all. 
4. Ensure a healthy standard of living for all. 
5. Create and develop healthy and sustainable places and communities. 
6. Strengthen the role and impact of ill health prevention. 
7. Tackle racism, discrimination and their outcomes. 
8. Pursue environmental sustainability and health equity together.

Article: Public health and health inequalities: a half century of personal involvement Michael Marmot Journal of Public Health, 2022

LSE Health's Annual Lecture:: Social justice and health equity March 2025, M.Marmot

 

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Geometries de la injustícia II

______________________________________________________________________

The generational differences: Health systems leaders need to modernize the workplace and workforce practices to reflect the values of younger health care workers.

Why new generations workers are leaving from healthcare sector?

Many younger workers cite toxic cultural dynamics, such as micromanagement, hierarchical structures, and lack of support from leadership, as significant contributors to dissatisfaction and burnout.

Younger health care workers (physicians, nurses, social care, data managers, economists, lawyers....,),  have different values than older health care workers like:

1. Work-Life Balance: Many new workers prioritize flexibility and mental health, yet the rigid schedules and high stress of healthcare roles often clash with these values.
2. Communication Challenges: New employees increasingly seek purpose-driven careers, and closing the loop on communication is crucial. Are new employees instructed on how to communicate?. The practice of medicine is based on human interaction and communication, as well as science. Balancing patient needs inside an environment of mutual respect is the goal. The deskless workforce in healthcare is high-touch, with patient and co-worker interaction at the center of service delivery. Knowing how to build trust and collaborate is key, across all generations.
3. Conflict with Traditional Structures: Many younger employees feel out of sync with the hierarchical and rigid structures common in healthcare organizations, preferring collaborative and innovative environments.

Health system leaders and administrators should consider new strategies to modernize the workplace and workforce practices to reflect the values of younger health care workers.

• Create an environment to report instances of discrimination, inequalities, and racism quickly and anonymously.
• Develop equity-centered hiring and retention practices. Including (DEI) practice: diversity, equity, and inclusion. Employees want to work at organizations that prioritize DEI practices.
• Design a healthy environment that prioritizes employee wellness. Early-career health care workers who began working during the COVID-19 pandemic endured unprecedented stress and pressure that likely influenced their outlook. Both early-career and longtime health care workers increasingly report feeling burnt out; health care leaders need to create work environments that support overall wellbeing and make workers feel heard and valued. 
• Promote empathy among the managers and leaders to understand the concerns, feelings, and thoughts of their teams.
• Provide employment opportunities for people with disabilities.
• Create a specific mentoring programms to increase awareness regarding gender, young and old, diversity, equity, and inclusion in an organization.
• Support its employees at every step in their career and promote also the accountability at every step: “Accountability breeds response-ability.”― Stephen R. Covey.

Source: 

1. Morenike Ayo-Vaughan and Laurie Zephyrin, “Young Health Care Workers See More Discrimination in the Workplace, Leading to Added Stress and Burnout,” To the Point (blog), Commonwealth Fund, May 29, 2024. Blog

2. Forbes 2024

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Seqüència Xostakòvitx. Quartet número núm  8,

 ______________________________________________________________________

Managers in health care sector

Key ideas:

• The necessary skills of healthcare managers involve planning, organizing, implementing, monitoring, and evaluation skills.
• Management skills are focused on the use of organizational resources but they also have to center on the mobilization of the members of the organization.
• The good healthcare manager provides trust and confidence to staff and appreciates staff efforts.
• Communication and critical thinking skills, relational and organizations skills for healthcare management, were seen as essential competencies for development.
• Additional skills to manage subordinates and coordinate with top-level managers is necessary: like self-awareness, change management, and conflict resolution.
• Clarity on the roles and responsibilities of existing and new professionals working in healthcare is necessary.
• Interprofessional healthcare management can resolve the issue of superiority and inferiority among healthcare professions – medicine, nursing, allied health including laboratory and pharmacy, among others. It reinforces humility and teamwork while acknowledging the importance of each profession for the improvement of health.
• If a healthcare manager knows how to lead himself, it then becomes easier for him/her to familiarize and knowing more both the members and the organization well.
• Well-managed staff can lead to well-managed patients.
• Management skills can impact positively on patients’ health outcomes.
• Healthcare management is a profession

Bayot ML, Varacallo MA. Management Skills. [Updated 2023 Sep 4]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. 

Article

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Màcula de la “L” de l’espai Serrahima

_______________________________________________________________________

Research on Integrated Care Systems: workforce

Integrated care systems (ICSs) were given statutory powers and new legal responsibilities for the first time in July 2022 in UK. 

These changes were intended to increase collaboration in the health and social care sector and to enable the NHS, local authorities and other partners to take collective responsibility for improving health outcomes, reducing inequalities, delivering better value for money, and driving local social and economic development. 

This research examines the development of ICSs by assessing their efforts to develop system-wide approaches to the recruitment, training and retention of staff. Workforce issues such as these are currently some of the biggest challenges facing the health and care sector, and require a co-ordinated response from multiple organisations of the kind that ICSs were designed to enable. 

Leading system-wide transformation is slow and the work is hard, but there are clear signs that progress is being made. 

The research identified six distinctive ways in which ICSs are adding value: ◦ organising around a shared purpose ◦ building system leadership ◦ encouraging system-focused behaviours ◦ scaling and spreading success ◦ using resources more effectively ◦ managing complexity. The degree which this is happening varies across systems. 

Despite signs of progress, there is a clear risk of ICSs going ‘off track’ as a result of pressures on services, intense political scrutiny, and extremely difficult economic circumstances – and the effect these conditions are having on the behaviours of leaders locally, regionally and nationally. There is widespread concern that ICSs may not achieve their full potential unless more is done to create an environment conducive to their success. 

The research suggests that success relies primarily on supporting people to think, plan and act in ‘system-focused’ ways. If this is to happen, different behaviours are needed at all levels of the system. National bodies need to create a more enabling environment and ensure that accountability and funding mechanisms support system working. Local leaders need to model system working in their relationships with partners across the system. 

There is considerable interest in how ICSs are performing and there is a danger that attention focuses on the things that are easier to measure. The research suggests that the less visible work of supporting people to work together differently is critical for success and must not be undervalued. The ability to do this well is one of the key factors that will determine whether ICSs succeed in delivering better population health and more joined-up care for people using services.

Kingsfund report ICS, 2024

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Iteració de les portes tancades

_______________________________________________________________________

Is competitive pressure essential for sustaining quality in primary care services?

The authors Eduard Brüll, Davud Rostam-Afschar, and Oliver Schlenker study how the threat of entry affects service quantity and quality of general practitioners (GPs).

They leverage Germany’s needs-based primary care planning system, in which the likelihood of new GPs reduces by 20 percentage points when primary care coverage exceeds a cut-off. They compile novel data covering all German primary care regions and up to 30,000 GP-level observations from 2014 to 2019. Reduced threat of entry lowers patient satisfaction for incumbent GPs without nearby competitors but not in areas with competitors. They find no effects on working hours or quality measures at the regional level including hospitalizations and mortality.

While entry restrictions aim to ensure equitable access to care, they can unintentionally reduce service quality by weakening competition. Policymakers must navigate this trade-off carefully, ensuring that access does not come at the expense of quality. By preserving competitive incentives even in regulated markets, healthcare systems can achieve both equitable and high-quality care.

IZA Discussion Paper No. 17534

Access to working paper 2024 (pdf)

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Merry Christmas

_______________________________________________________________________

València. Building Disaster Resilience: A Systems Approach to Leadership Communication

 

This commentary published by Rand  by Millard McElwee and Monika Cooper last November the 4th (2024), can serve the Spanish authorities (local, autonomous communities and national) to reflect on how to improve the communication of possible disasters such as the one that occurred in València.

Some thoughts: 

"The future of disaster resilience requires us to learn from past political failures, such as the response to Hurricane Katrina, where the lack of clear communication and cohesive narratives deepened mistrust and fragmented communities. 

The inability to align messages across federal, state, and local levels not only delayed critical aid but also exposed the consequences of failing to address social and political divides. 

To move forward, policies must integrate AI and green infrastructure with a focus on rebuilding trust through transparent, unified narratives that guide communities in understanding risks and empowering them to act. Only by bridging these divides can the resilience needed to confront future climate threats be built".

Acces to the commentary: Building disaster resilience

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Geometries de la injustícia

_______________________________________________________________________

Centering Equity in the Implementation of Emerging Digital Health Technologies: AI, genomic medicine, digital media

Despite unprecedented spending on health in the United States and the rapid expansion in types and innovations of digital health technologies, many populations still get sick and die at higher rates than others. 

To address these persistent health inequities in the US, it will be crucial to center health equity in the implementation of digital health technologies, such as artificial intelligence or personalized genomic medicine. As the two nascent fields of health equity and digital equity find their footing after rapid implementation and scale-up in the post–coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic world, a focus on equitable implementation is particularly important to ensure that digital health technologies do not perpetuate or create new health inequities. However, to date, these fields have had a limited or siloed focus on equitable implementation.

This paper is the inaugural report in the RAND Center to Advance Racial Equity Policy Methods Volume series. This paper will be the first to center health equity in the implementation of digital health technologies by adapting a methodological framework for its implementation to support the planning and evaluation of digital health technologies. Without an explicit focus on equitable implementation, digital health technologies run the risk of further exacerbating existing health inequities or creating new ones. This paper offers approaches to policymakers, implementation scientists, clinical scientists, government regulatory bodies, and those working in the health and digital technology fields to take the lead in centering equity.

The paper, first describe the persistent health inequities in the United States and how the rapid adoption of digital health technologies can perpetuate those inequities. Then they discuss challenges and limitations of Implementation Science (IS) in centering equity in the rapid adoption of digital health technologies and translating these technologies into equitable improvements in public health. Next, they provide examples of how IS process and evaluation frameworks can be adapted to focus on digital and health equity to leverage emerging health technologies to course correct and address inequitable health outcomes.

Finally, they discuss how these adapted IS process and evaluation frameworks can be applied to address the pitfalls—and realize the promise—of three emerging fields at the intersection of racial and digital health equity: (1) genomic medicine, (2) artificial intelligence (AI) (specifically large language models [LLMs]), and (3) participatory digital media (e.g., blogs, digital stories).

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Gaza. Geometries de la injustícia

_______________________________________________________________________

What builds good health? An introduction to the building blocks of health

Health is our most precious asset. Good health and wellbeing enable us to live happy, fulfilling lives and free us up to achieve our potential, supporting positive social and economic outcomes for individuals and society. But we don’t all have the same opportunities to live healthy lives. Right now, in our country, some people are dying years earlier than they should. This isn’t inevitable. There is much we can do to reduce these unfair differences by improving the things that underpin our health.

Many aspects of our lives impact our health and how long we live. These include our jobs and homes, our access to education, public transport and safe green spaces with clean air, and whether we experience poverty or discrimination. These things are often referred to as the ‘wider determinants of health’, and they are all essential building blocks of our health.

Building a healthy society is like constructing a building. To succeed, we need all the right blocks in place. The building blocks of health are: the food we eat; the work; the family, friends and communities; the transport; the housing; the money and resources; the education and skills; and the surroundings.

The The Health Foundation from the UK has published a guide that it is a brief introduction to the building blocks of health. It explains how a person’s opportunity for health is influenced by much more than the NHS, and why people in the UK don’t all have the same chance to be healthy. It also sets out how action to strengthen the building blocks of health can lead to improvements in the health of the whole population, for the benefit of individuals, society and the economy.

Guide (pdf)

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Èxode. Geometries de la injustícia

_______________________________________________________________________

Yes, Minister

Yes, Minister is a British political satire sitcom written by Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn. Comprising three seven-episode series, it was first transmitted on BBC2 from 1980 to 1984. A sequel, Yes, Prime Minister, ran for 16 episodes from 1986 to 1988.

It is a satirical sitcom set in the office of a UK Cabinet minister, Jim Hacker MP, who struggles with Civil Service bureaucracy and political machinations as he tries to get on with government business

Video: Funniest moments 

_______________________________________________________________________

Human resources in the National Health System. SESPAS Report 2024 (part 3)

The Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration publishes in Gaceta Sanitaria its biennial SESPAS 2024 Report, which shows a series of artices analysing the current situation of the National Health System in terms of Human Resources.

• Pay for performance in public directly managed healthcare centers. Part 1: General framework.  José-Ramón Repullo y JM Freire

• Pay for performance in public directly managed healthcare centers. Part 2: The Spanish National Health System.  José-Ramón Repullo y JM Freire

• Dual practice in the Spanish health system: problem or solution? Ariadna García-Prado, Paula González

• Recruitment, selection and retention of health professionals in indirect management and private management entities Olga Pané Mena y Pau Gomar Sánchez

• Health and well-being of healthcare workers: employment and working conditions beyond the pandemic Fernando G. Benavides et. al

Video: Rosa Urbanos entrevista a J.R.Repullo y J.M Freire

Video: Vicente Ortún entrevista a R.Meneu, O.Pané, P. González, P.Gomar 

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Geometries de la injustícia. Navalni

_______________________________________________________________________

Human resources in the National Health System. SESPAS Report 2024 (part 2)

The Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration publishes in Gaceta Sanitaria its biennial SESPAS 2024 Report, which shows a series of artices analysing the current situation of the National Health System in terms of Human Resources.

• Human resource management in health. Consensual paths forward 
• Miguel Angel Negrín, Vicente Ortún
• An overview of health workforce mobility in the European Union under the current supply challenges. Angela Blanco Moreno
• Dual practice in the Spanish health system: problem or solution? Ariadna García-Prado, Paula González
• Recruitment, selection and retention staffing policies in health services directly managed. Ricard Meneu

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Deconstruccions i iteracions de la realitat. Iteració lliure en blau

_______________________________________________________________________

Human resources in the National Health System. SESPAS Report 2024

The Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration publishes in Gaceta Sanitaria its biennial SESPAS 2024 Report, which shows a series of artices analysing the current situation of the National Health System in terms of Human Resources.

• Human resources in the National Health System. Medical education. Felipe Rodríguez de Castro, Teresa Carrillo Díaz, Arcadi Gual i Sala, Jordi Palés Argullós
• Experiences in human resources planning for health: The case of physicians. Data and models. Patricia Barber Pérez, Beatriz González López-Valcárcel
• What do we know and what should we know about the imbalances of doctors in Spain? Diagnosis and proposals. Beatriz González López-Valcárcel, Patricia Barber Pérez
• Shortage of nurses in Spain: from the global case to particular situation. Paola Galbany-Estragués, Pere Millán-Martínez
• The challenges of human resources governance in public healthcare. Javier Hernández Pascual

Press conference video

Photo Jordi Soldevila. Homenatge a Toni Catany. Plats vells.

_______________________________________________________________________